Signature: Difference between revisions

From Proghq
Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 28: Line 28:
! Chip label
! Chip label
! Die ID
! Die ID
! Notes
|-
|-
| row 1, cell 1
| 1E51FF
| row 1, cell 2
| Atmel
| row 1, cell 3
| AT89C51
| row 1, cell 3
| 19052
|
|-
|-
| row 2, cell 1
| 9ED100
| row 2, cell 2
| Atmel
| row 2, cell 3
| AT89C51
| row 2, cell 3
| 19651
|
|-
|
| Atmel
| AT89C52
| 19652
|  
|}
|}


= 87C51 family =
= 87C51 family =

Revision as of 17:39, 12 August 2018

Documents signature bytes used on EPROM, AT89C51, 87C51, etc.


Is AT89C51 signature the same as P87C51 signature?

Do mcs51 mask ROM parts support signature?

Are EPROM signatures compatible with mcs51 signatures in any way?

JEDEC

https://www.jedec.org/standards-documents/docs/jep-106ab

Think these are flash specific

"JEDEC SOLID STATE TECHNOLOGY ASSOCIATION"

"The intent of this identification code is that it may be used whenever a digital field is required, e.g., hardware, software, documentation, etc."

89C51 family

IDs are found at special NV memory address 0x30-0x32

ID (hex) Vendor Chip label Die ID Notes
1E51FF Atmel AT89C51 19052
9ED100 Atmel AT89C51 19651
Atmel AT89C52 19652

87C51 family