Signature: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Documents signature bytes used on EPROM, AT89C51, 87C51, etc. | Documents signature bytes used on EPROM, AT89C51, 87C51, etc. | ||
TODO: | |||
Is | - Is 87C51 and 89C51 signature protocol the same? | ||
- Do mcs51 mask ROM parts support signature? | |||
Do mcs51 mask ROM parts support signature? | - Are EPROM signatures compatible with mcs51 signatures? | ||
Are EPROM signatures compatible with mcs51 signatures | |||
= JEDEC = | = JEDEC = | ||
Revision as of 17:47, 12 August 2018
Documents signature bytes used on EPROM, AT89C51, 87C51, etc.
TODO:
- Is 87C51 and 89C51 signature protocol the same? - Do mcs51 mask ROM parts support signature? - Are EPROM signatures compatible with mcs51 signatures?
JEDEC
https://www.jedec.org/standards-documents/docs/jep-106ab
Think these are flash specific
"JEDEC SOLID STATE TECHNOLOGY ASSOCIATION"
"The intent of this identification code is that it may be used whenever a digital field is required, e.g., hardware, software, documentation, etc."
89C51 family
IDs are found at special NV memory address 0x30-0x32
| Sig (hex) | Vendor | Chip label | Die ID | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1E51FF | Atmel | AT89C51 | 19052 | |
| 9ED100 | Atmel | AT89C51 | 19651 | |
| 1E52FF | Atmel | AT89C52 | (19652) | Die ID was for a AT89C52, but not verified to have the same signature words |