Signature: Difference between revisions

From Proghq
Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
Documents signature bytes used on EPROM, AT89C51, 87C51, etc.
Documents signature bytes used on EPROM, AT89C51, 87C51, etc.


https://www.jedec.org/standards-documents/docs/jep-106ab


Is AT89C51 signature the same as P87C51 signature?
Is AT89C51 signature the same as P87C51 signature?
Line 8: Line 7:


Are EPROM signatures compatible with mcs51 signatures in any way?
Are EPROM signatures compatible with mcs51 signatures in any way?
= JEDEC =
https://www.jedec.org/standards-documents/docs/jep-106ab
Think these are flash specific
"JEDEC SOLID STATE TECHNOLOGY ASSOCIATION"
"The intent of this identification code is that it may be used whenever a digital field is required, e.g., hardware, software, documentation, etc."


= 89C51 family =
= 89C51 family =

Revision as of 17:26, 12 August 2018

Documents signature bytes used on EPROM, AT89C51, 87C51, etc.


Is AT89C51 signature the same as P87C51 signature?

Do mcs51 mask ROM parts support signature?

Are EPROM signatures compatible with mcs51 signatures in any way?

JEDEC

https://www.jedec.org/standards-documents/docs/jep-106ab

Think these are flash specific

"JEDEC SOLID STATE TECHNOLOGY ASSOCIATION"

"The intent of this identification code is that it may be used whenever a digital field is required, e.g., hardware, software, documentation, etc."

89C51 family

IDs are found at special NV memory address 0x30-0x32

ID (hex) Vendor Chip label Die ID
row 1, cell 1 row 1, cell 2 row 1, cell 3 row 1, cell 3
row 2, cell 1 row 2, cell 2 row 2, cell 3 row 2, cell 3

87C51 family